As part of the Battersea Powerstation redevelopment in London, the project proposes an alternative social housing scheme that is a critique of the Developer’s profit-making intentions. Through Section 106 agreements, the Developers have not only reduced the required number of social housing to just 9%, but have also moved them offsite adjacent to the railway tracks- a less desirable edge condition compared to the waterfront living standards offered to the luxury apartments. By proposing how the funds from the Community Infrastructure Levy can be expended, as opposed to Section 106 obligations, the proposal aims to achieve a degree of equity between luxury housing and social housing. The edge conditions are reworked through the construction of a bridge over the railway tracks, providing various amenities to both the residents and surrounding neighbourhood. However, since the intervention is an expensive endeavour, the proposal argues that developers should instead provide the required amount of social housing in the first place….