Throughout the year i was intrigued by the way society understands, sees and defines their surroundings. I was wondering how objects/spaces could be translated into something else. If so, could we still inhabit them? Is it a matter of definition? Dismantling and assembling? Or maybe even just re-organization?
What makes architectural elements the things they are, and what happen if we repurpose them. Do they stay the same? How does it affects our behavior?where does one end the other start?
Investigating the method of inhabiting space through filling the negative space. The Mowlem Paradox may seem incomplete, the physical structures complement these ideas, making them tangible/complete.
This Hybrid Space is my translation of an unresolved dialogue that unites the materiality, scales and the positive and negative volumes of my site into one space.
"When solid becomes hollow" is a translation of my plaster model by scaling up and changing it's material in effort to get different architectural values.
A Plan drawing that examines the relationships of the objects and spaces with each other.
Axonometric drawing of the new space.
By breaking the original layer of my drawings turning into a freestyle connection i created an unresolved dialogue. I threw myself into a very interesting territory of exploring my "mess".
Redefining my hand by its negative space created by its movement and the way it is inhabits the space by laser cutting Perspex rings and tubes, which extrude the invisible parallel part of each finger
Investigating the essence of the different objects and the way humans can inhabit them by changing their angle and their definition.
