With gentrification, urban spaces are expanding and pushing rural area further. City farm has become an important way to know about animals and nature in city. Current city farms are more like places for leisure or commercial use(farm shop). Although Visitors are close to animals, the fences and animal-playground-centred spaces are making it more like a zoo. City farms focus much on visiting but the link between human and nature are still weak.
On the other hand, current city farms are creating a beautiful image of human-nature for their visitors while some parts are missing on purpose. In terms of costs and efficiency, happy farms are not able to replace current food systems. The so-called happy farms are more like an idealised image and comforting for city dwellers.
As city dwellers, is it possible to step forward? Can city farm not be limited as a instagram photos factory and destination for family trip? City farm as a home processing animals, can it also be a place habitable and participatory for human? Can it contains good moments also bad moments?
Can city farm be more than a city farm?
new city farm in anthropocene

section

model-exploration of materiality and space languages

entry&burning

axo-final

chicken fridge - quadrat study

collaged model

bedroom

exploded axo
